Chemical Engineering

In your case, you essentially have two reactions: CH4 + 3/2 O2 ---> CO + 2 H2O (incomplete combustion) CH4 + 2 O2 ---> CO2 + 2 H2O (complete combustion) each of these reactions has a specific rate at which it occurs. If you wanted to design a reactor properly, you would need to determine the conversion of methane in each of the above reactions. The upper limit of your flow rate is bound by the rate of reaction. If the flow rate is too high, the reaction simply will not take place (i.e. the flame will burn out). I am not sure that there is a simple relationship between pressure and flow rate in this case. The gases need to spend a certain amount of time in the reactor in order for the combustion to take place (residence time). Once you know the residence time, you could design a reactor for your specific flow rate.

The following are items to consider when designing a piping system that will transport slurries:

1) Whenever possible, piping should be designed to be self-draining

2) Manual draining should be installed to drain sections of the piping when self-draining is not possible

3) Blow-out or rod-out connections should be provided to clear lines in places where plugging is likely or could occur

4) Access flanges should be provided at T-connections

5) Manifolds should have flanged rather than capped connections to allow for easy access

6) Clean-out connections should be provided on BOTH sides of main line valves so that flushing can take place in either direction

7) Break flanges should be provided every 20 feet of horizontal pipe or after every two changes in direction

Mr. Richard Lee of Plumlee International Consulting usually heat exchangers have two sets of test pressures per side, one for strength tests, and the other for "operating" or "leak" tests. The strength tests are set by the design code and if you have the original design data sheets for your equipment then the information should be shown on these. If you do not then you will have to do the calculations yourself, the exact method will depend upon which design code you use, the most common one being TEMA (which uses the ANSI/ASME pressure vessel code for reference in this area).

Most shell and tube exchangers are designed such that each side of the unit will withstand the full design pressure, with only atmospheric pressure on the other side. In order to save money, some larger units will have the tube-sheets especially designed to withstand only a much lower differential pressure (requiring both sides to be tested simultaneously). This important information should be shall quite clearly on the design sheets and on the vessel nameplate (assuming that either are available). If the only need is to check that a gasket has been properly installed then it can be permissible to perform a lower pressure test based on the operating pressure. The acceptability of this lower pressure test will often depend upon the consequences of a leak.

There is an Australian standard "AS1020 (1984) - Control of undesirable Static Electricity" In it, there is a table for flammable hydrocarbons as follows:

Pipe Size (mm) Max Velocity (m/s)

10 8

25 4.9

50 3.5

100 2.5

200 1.8

400 1.3

600+ 1.0

This is based on pure hydrocarbons, and there is a correction, which can be applied for fluids of different conductivity. Methanol has a higher polarity than hydrocarbons and hence is more conductive. The resistivity of diesel is 1013 ohm-m vs 108 for methanol. In addition to this, normal piping design guidelines should however be followed, such as appropriate earthing, and ensuring exit velocities into tanks of 1 m/s.

API RP520 gives equations to calculate relief requirements. For thermal relief, a very simple formula requires the heat input and the coefficient of thermal expansion of the liquid. The heat input could be a problem. If you are concerned about sulfuric in a line that is part of a heat exchanger system, then the heat is simply the design capacity of the heat exchanger. If it were a pipeline in the sun, then you would have to calculate the amount of heat that the sun can put into the pipe. You can get the coefficient of thermal expansion from your supplier or any book on sulfuric. You can also calculate it by taking the specific gravity at two different temperatures and divide the SG difference by the temperature difference. Coefficient of expansion has the units of 1/0F. Now for the easy part, if you are at all concerned, just put in a 3/4" x 1" thermal relief valve and do not worry about doing any calculations. However, I do not believe sulfuric has any problems in pipelines unless it is a very long one and directly in the sun. In addition, I would make it a standard procedure to drain the line if it will sit dead headed for any significant period. Just a small bleed will be enough.

Sizing a PSV on your vessel is a matter of calculating how much heat is inputted from the fire. API-520 uses Q = FA0.82 where Q is BTU/hr, F is the insulation factor (commonly taken as 1.0 but can be less than 1.0 if your insulation will remain effective during the fire and not be dislodged by fire hoses) and finally, A is the external area in ft2. The vapor load is then the total heat input from the fire divided by the liquid's latent heat (BTU/lb).

As a fluid approaches its critical pressure, the latent heat as it boils decreases so the relieving flow rate increases. At the critical point, the latent heat goes to 0. Some companies simply use a minimum 50 BTU/lb latent heat others look at de-pressuring equipment, etc. One point is the protection, or potential lack of it, provided by a PSV during a fire. The boiling liquid in the vessel from the fire helps keep the metal 'cool' so it retains its strength. Once the liquid is gone or the flame impinges on the wall not in contact with liquid, the metal can quickly reach a temperature where it has insufficient strength to withstand the internal pressure and you have a BLEVE. Not something, you want to be around. As an added point to the information above, if 50 Btu/lb is not your company’s minimum standard for latent heat, here is an alternative to calculate the latent heat:

Mr. Alex C. Hoffmann of the Stratingh Institute for Chemistry and Chemical Engineering states: "Whether a material can be fluidized at all is the question: if it is fine or sticky, the bed will be cohesive. It will then tend to form channels through which the aeration gas will escape rather than being dispersed through the interstices supporting the particles. In the other extreme: if the particles are too large and heavy the bed will not fluidize well either, but tend to be very turbulent and form a spout." He goes on to present classification of fluidization by Geldart by use of the chart shown below. On this chart, the x-axis is the average particle diameter and the y-axis is the bulk density of the bed.

Tank Blanketing Valves provide an effective means of preventing and controlling fires in flammable liquid storage tanks. Vapors cannot be ignited in the absence of an adequate supply of oxygen. In most instances, this oxygen is provided by air drawn into the tank from the atmosphere during tank emptying operations. Tank Blanketing Valves are installed with their inlet connected to a supply of pressurized inert gas (usually Nitrogen), and their outlet piped into the tank's vapor space. When the tank pressure drops below a predetermined level, the blanketing valve opens and allows a flow of inert gas into the vapor space. The blanketing valve reseals when pressure in the tank has returned to an acceptable level.

Where carbon steel is an appropriate material of construction, NACE (National Association of Corrosion Engineers) has issued the following standard: NACE RP0472, "Methods and controls to prevent in-service environmental cracking of carbon-steel weldments in corrosive petroleum refining environments”. For welds where hardness testing is required, RP0472 give the following guidelines: A. Testing shall be taken with a portable Brinell hardness tester. Test technique guidelines are given in an appendix in the standard. B. Testing shall be done on the process side whenever possible. C. For vessel or tank butt welds, one test per 10 feet of seam with a minimum of one location per seam is required. One test shall be done on each nozzle flange-to-neck and nozzle neck-to-shell (or neck-to-head) weld. D. A percentage of helping welds shall be tested (5 percent minimum is suggested). E. Testing of fillet welds should be done when feasible (with the testing frequency similar to the butt welds). F. Each welding procedure used shall be tested. G. Welds that exceed 200 Brinell shall be heat treated or removed.

Bellow expansion joints have gained a reputation for being "weak" points in piping. Usually they are used to remove piping stresses from equipment or to allow for minor piping moments. If they are used properly, expansion joints can save equipment and/or equipment welds from stresses generated from piping forces. The two most common complaints about bellows are 1. They tend to build up dirt 2. They are "weak" point in piping (as noted earlier). To overcome these issues, manufacturers can began installing drains in the bellows to allow for the period purging of material. Additionally, bellow manufacturers have placed much emphasis on installation advice and showing their customers how to protect the bellow from unnecessary damage. One such method is the use of tie rods between the end flanges to avoid pressure thrust movements (beyond the bellow's design conditions) which are often the cause of bellow failures